Conway admittedly has made a great deal of money as an early investor in some major internet successes (Facebook and Twiiter, e.g.)  but has lost a lot of money, as well (anyone remember the sock-puppet “spokesdog” for Pet.com?)  He is, nonetheless, passionate about the importance of innovation and the internet claiming the industry represents 2 million jobs in the US alone.  The accompanying video is an unedited record of his remarks, followed by his proposal to take internet piracy out of the hands of legislators and put it into the hands of the people it needs to protect, the technologists.

The day was marked by live protests around the nation as well as online protests.  Wikipedia, Reddit and WordPress among many others took their sites off line with only a request for visitors to write their representatives to pull support for the bills.  the protest seems to have had some effect as bill sponsors, like Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio removed his name from the bill.  The authors of both bills, Rep Lamar Smith of Texas and Senator Patrick Leahy have dug in their heels calling the protestors and the striking companies as “misinformed” about the bills.

Conway, in his remarks calling for a private effort to address the issue did not downplay the problem, but said the legislation proposed was ill-advised.

Bookmark and Share

More »

Powered by Bookmarkify™

The acquisition of Magma Design Automation by Synopsys was arguably the biggest story of the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) industry in 2011.  It will also most likely end up being the biggest EDA story of 2012 as well.

Most observers were stunned at the news, and not because it was an unlikely fit.  It’s actually a great fit and gives Synopsys a virtual stranglehold on the digital IC design market. It was improbable because of the deep-set enmity between the two companies, especially between the two CEOs, Aart DeGeus and Rajeev Madhavan.  Both companies launched multiple lawsuits against each other over the past decade claiming patent infringement on a variety of technologies, all of which have been resolved prior to the acquisition but left scars throughout both companies.  As one source that spent time as an employee in both companies said, “It was personal for some people and just business for others but it was pervasive.”

The acrimony between DeGeus and Madhavan often manifested publicly.  DeGeus would often be absent from CEO panels where Madhavan was present, and Magma employees and supporters made sure the industry noted that Madhavan was often not invited when the leadership of Cadence, Mentor Graphics and Synopsys were represented.

Madhavan also perennially accused Synopsys of deliberately undercutting prices in large package deals, a charge DeGeus vehemently denied, perennially.  To Synopsys’ defense, however, it was an unofficial industry-wide practice, according to Jeff Jussel, senior director of global technology marketing at element14.  Jussel is a former ASIC designer and EDA executive (including marketing director at Magma) and is leading element14′s push into embedded and electronic design services.

There was so much competition between the big four it drove a never ending spiral of ever cheaper prices.  Better results, better productivity, but less and less money for the developers of that technology.  The big guys could deal with it better because they had the big “all you can eat” deals.  1 million for one year, 3 million for two years, 4 million for five years.  The deals looked bigger, but the terms were getting longer and the price per seat was coming down.  It started killing the innovation in start-ups because there was so much pressure on margins that there was nothing left to buy from the start-ups, and the start-ups were getting pushed to the side by the deals,” said Jussel.  “The practice squeezed innovative start-ups out of the market because they couldn’t compete and be profitable.”

Synopsys bought many failed start-ups for the cost of assets alone, eliminating competition and gaining valuable technology with little investment.  As this practice continued industry wide, investors saw little upside in funding new start-ups and, at present, there is virtually no interest in funding new companies that have no chance of an IPO nor of being acquired for a premium over investment.  This is where the acquisition of Magma may have the greatest potential for energizing the moribund industry.

First, it consolidates the industry nicely.  Synopsys holds digital, Cadence leads in analog and mixed signal, and Mentor dominates embedded design.  The lawsuits and undercutting that decimated the start-ups will be a thing of the past.  Customers will have to pay what the vendors ask or be forced to build their own solutions…or look to start-ups. Which brings us to the second reason.

At $507 million, it is the single largest acquisition in the industry’s history, eclipsing Cadence’s acquisition of Cooper & Chyan Technologies for $428 million in 1997.  When combined with the Ansys purchase of Apache Design for more $310 million and a handful of other smaller deal this year it helps release nearly a billion dollars of cash into the pockets of investors and founders.  All of these deals will be concluded before the Design Automation Conference in San Francisco this July.  Conservatively, the industry could see $100 million of that invested in new technology before the end of 2012.

And who will be leading that charge?  None other than Rajeev Madhavan.

Madhavan could be called the single most successful entrepreneur in the EDA industry.    He was a founder of LogicVision, a company that was sucked up by Mentor Graphics for $13 million in Mentor stock. He founded Ambit to attack the Synopsys logic synthesis hegemony, using guerilla marketing techniques to grab market share and, in the end, sold out to Cadence for a quarter billion dollars.  Madhavan reinvested much of his take into founding Magma, which went from start up to IPO in short order.  Combined with the Ambit valuation, Madhavan-founded companies account for over $700 million in corporate value.  No other single entrepreneur has those kind of results in their resume.

The sale agreement precludes Magma or Synopsys representatives’ speculation on who stays and who goes.  There are those who hope Madhavan stays put for some time and he must make that commitment for the sake of the deal.  But no one believes that DeGeus will want his nemesis hanging around the office coffee bar any longer than is necessary, and he will have followers as he goes out the door.

“I expect Rajeev to be gone within days of the deal being done,” Jussel stated.

That is not to say there will be a mass exodus.  According to Jussel, Magma has “some of the most intelligent and best educated people in the industry who love creating technology for IC Design.  They’re working for the customers, not the logo.”  Those are the people that Synopsys want to keep, and they will be very generous to them.

DeGeus has stated that the talent of Magma was what was important to Synopsys, not the technology, so does that mean Magma’s tools are going away?  Jussel laughed at that question. “We’ll see how that works out.  The existing installed base loves the Magma tools so they will continue to support those product lines or lose the business altogether.”

But there will be business minds with wads of cash in their pockets that won’t be as welcome.  The doors of start-ups will be wide open for these people.  That is very good news for an industry that has limped along for much of the past two decades and whose lack of consistent innovation has held back the semiconductor industry as well.

 Was the Synopsys Magma deal good for the industry?  Tell us why at element14.com

Bookmark and Share

More »

Powered by Bookmarkify™

Poland is due to become an official member of the Euro Zone in January 2012 and is obliged, under the terms of the Treaty of Accession 2003, to replace its current currency, the Zloty, with the Euro, however, the country may adopt the Euro no earlier than 2019.  That’s probably good news for Polish start ups that seem to be able to find plenty of government support and venture capital for a raft of innovative technologies.

Footwasher Media’s Lou Covey sat down with three Polish startup companies touring Silicon Valley recently, as they were on the hunt for partners and investors to help them expand into the US.  The three companies were Ekoenergetyka with electric vehicle charging technology, virtual environment maker i3d , and a chemical synthesis innovator called Apeiron.

This interview is the first in a series of reports and interviews on the state of European innovation and efforts of the European Commission’s Digital Agenda.

Bookmark and Share

More »

Powered by Bookmarkify™

The aftermarket device provides the touch interface not available on PC-based instruments turning any iOS device into an ultraportable spectrum analyzer and dynamic power meter.  WiPry-Combo shows RF waveforms like an oscilloscope.  Actual power output can be triggered, captured, and recorded for protocol verification or for troubleshooting wireless devices with data logging in csv format.

In the spectrum analyzer mode, WiPry-Combo can identify interference or open channels in the 2.4GHz ISM band. Operating in the frequency range: 2.400 to 2.495 GHz, it measures signals from -40dBm to +20dBm with an amplitude resolution of 2.0dBm and a bandwidth resolution of 1MHz.  The band sweep time is 200ms.

The dynamic power meter mode graphically displays RF power levels in the 100MHz-2.7GHz waveform amplitude with respect to time.

The device is available from the company for $199.95. Software, including a demo package that does not require the actual WiPry device, is available free at the Apple™ AppStore, and is available in English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish.

Sponsored by element14

Bookmark and Share

More »

Powered by Bookmarkify™

The web is awash with reviews of the Kindle Fire, many positive (some scathingly negative), and the comparisons to the iPad are just as plentiful.  The question that keeps coming up, however, is the Fire a game changer in the tablet war?  Probably not for Apple, but probably in the Android world and definitely in the remains of RIM’s empire.

In the iPad comparison, the Fire is the inexpensive, entry-level tablet for noobs.  At $199  it is better than half the price of the iPad, which means people who want the media experience of a tablet at bargain prices, it’s a good choice. Although Apple has released the latest version of the iPod Touch at the same price, so if the user doesn’t care about the screen size, you can get a more flexible, powerful product from Apple, still. The Fire performs slower and using key pad apps will be difficult on the much smaller screen, barring significant improvements in touch technology.

The iPad, especially when paired with an after-market bluetooth keyboard, makes an effective laptop replacement.  There are even productivity apps that make it possible to use the iPad for word processing, spreadsheets and presentations. All of that is lacking in the Fire.  As far as content goes, the fire serves well as a distribution method for Amazon, but like most Android devices, it lacks the depth of apps in the iOS universe.  So Apple execs won’t be losing any sleep over the sales of the Fire. Google, on the other hand… The introduction of the Fire further fragments the developer community that is divided between iOS, Android, Blackberry and even Microsoft 7 Phone (MS7).  Developers can bypass the Google Market

IDC survey shows Kindle Fire app development cutting in on Android market

and deal directly with Amazon, which is great for Amazon but not so much for Google.  IDC just released a quarterly survey that shows that developers are abandoning all other tablets in north America to create apps for the Fire.  The trend seems to be going that way in Asia and Europe, as well.  So while Google was looking at Apple as their main competitor, Amazon has been snaking the market out from under them.  Yoink! The future for RIM’s Blackberry is even grimmer.  The same IDC report said MS7 has now surpassed RIM as the third place tablet OS developers prefer to work in.  Along with the continuing decline in the overall device market, RIM seems to be hanging on by it’s fingernails. So the Fire IS a game changer for RIM.  Their technology has just not kept up with the market development.  The Playbook was a joke, a little less funny than HP’s tablet.

RIM is going nowhere… except into someone else’s division. RIM still has a lot of value.  They have a pretty loyal customer base, albeit shrinking. They have that bag of Nortel patents in wireless technology, the best security platform and the best integration of MS Exchange and Lotus notes.  Microsoft could become a serious competitor to Android and iOS if they bought RIM, and that would change the game for everyone.

Sponsored by element14.com

Bookmark and Share

More »

Powered by Bookmarkify™